Current:Home > MyArizona abortion rights advocates submit double the signatures needed to put constitutional amendment on ballot -FundPrime
Arizona abortion rights advocates submit double the signatures needed to put constitutional amendment on ballot
View
Date:2025-04-12 03:22:09
Washington — Abortion rights advocates in Arizona on Wednesday submitted more than double the signatures needed to place an initiative on the November ballot that would enshrine the right to abortion in the state's constitution.
Organizers with Arizona for Abortion Access, the coalition behind the effort, said they submitted 823,685 signatures, far more than the 383,923 required to place an initiative proposing a constitutional amendment before voters.
The Arizona Constitution requires valid signatures from 15% of registered voters for ballot questions. The secretary of state and county officials will next process the petitions and determine whether enough valid signatures were gathered to put the proposal on the ballot. The deadline for completing that validation process is in August.
Called the Arizona Abortion Access Act, the initiative would amend the state constitution to establish the right to abortion. Under the plan, the state would not be allowed to restrict access to abortion before viability, generally around 22 to 24 weeks in a pregnancy. An abortion may be performed after viability if necessary to save the life of the mother, or her physical or mental health. The proposal prohibits the state from penalizing others for assisting a pregnant woman in exercising her right to abortion.
"This is the most signatures ever gathered for a ballot measure in Arizona history, which is a testament to the broad support among Arizona voters for restoring and protecting abortion access in Arizona," Cheryl Bruce, campaign manager of Arizona for Abortion Access, said in a statement.
If the measure is cleared for the November ballot, Arizona would join at least five other states where voters will decide whether to amend their respective state constitutions to recognize the right to abortion. Those states are Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Nevada and South Dakota.
Efforts are underway in several other states, including Arkansas, Missouri, Montana and Nebraska, to get the issue on the Nov. 5 ballot.
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022 and cleared the way for states to enact laws restricting access to abortion, the issue has become a motivator for voters, and Democrats are hoping that remains the case for this year's general election.
In the wake of the high court's decision, the abortion rights position has succeeded in seven states where the issue was squarely before voters. In Kansas, Kentucky and Montana, anti-abortion rights proposals failed. Meanwhile, in California, Michigan, Ohio and Vermont, measures to enshrine access in state constitutions were successful.
Abortion is banned in Arizona after 15 weeks of pregnancy. But the state recently became the center of a fierce ballot over access after its supreme court ruled that an 1864 law outlawing the procedure, except when necessary to save the mother's life, could be enforced.
The decision set off a frenzy of legislative activity in the state, as lawmakers moved swiftly to repeal the Civil War-era law, which remained on the books but hadn't been enforced since the 1973 Roe decision legalizing abortion nationwide. Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, signed a bill in May unwinding the pre-Roe ban, though it won't take effect until 90 days after the end of the state legislative session, which adjourned last month.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (35)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Gas prices are going back up: These states have seen the biggest increases lately
- Shannen Doherty, Holly Marie Combs and More Charmed Stars Set for Magical Reunion
- Chad Daybell's desire for sex, money and power led to deaths of wife and Lori Vallow Daybell's children, prosecutor says
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Convicted child abuser Jodi Hildebrandt's $5 million Utah home was most-viewed listing on Realtor.com last week
- One killed, five wounded when shooters open fire on crowd in DC neighborhood
- One killed, five wounded when shooters open fire on crowd in DC neighborhood
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Adam Silver: Raptors' Jontay Porter allegations are a 'cardinal sin' in NBA
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- How Tyus Jones became one of the most underrated point guards in the NBA
- Iowa will retire Caitlin Clark's No. 22 jersey: 'There will never be another'
- Valerie Bertinelli slams Food Network: 'It's not about cooking or learning any longer'
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Scientists are grasping at straws while trying to protect infant corals from hungry fish
- ISIS stadium threat puts UEFA Champions League soccer teams on alert for quarterfinals
- Chad Daybell's desire for sex, money and power led to deaths of wife and Lori Vallow Daybell's children, prosecutor says
Recommendation
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
RHOSLC's Monica Garcia Shares She's Pregnant With Mystery Boyfriend's Baby on Viall Files
One killed, five wounded when shooters open fire on crowd in DC neighborhood
Augusta National chairman says women's golf needs 'unicorns' like Caitlin Clark
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Psych exams ordered for mother of boy found dead in suitcase in southern Indiana
There's a new apple hybrid that's both 'firm and tasty.' And the public gets to name it
Why is the EPA regulating PFAS and what are these “forever chemicals”?