Current:Home > ScamsThis Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it -FundPrime
This Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it
View
Date:2025-04-12 18:12:03
Social Security's trust funds are expected to be depleted in 2034, according to a recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report. This could lead to substantial benefit cuts if the government doesn't find a way to increase the program's funding. But finding a solution most people can agree on isn't easy.
Some have proposed raising Social Security payroll taxes. This would leave workers with less money to spend today or save for their futures, so it's understandably unpopular with a lot of people. But there's another tax-increasing reform that's actually gotten a lot of support from people in both political camps.
It would make the wealthy pay more
Most people pay Social Security payroll taxes on all of their income each year, but this isn't the case for high earners. In 2024, only the first $168,600 a person earns is subject to these taxes. Anything over this amount is not, but it also doesn't help increase your Social Security benefit in retirement.
Many believe that these high earners should pay more in Social Security taxes to help sustain the program. Some have argued for doing away with the ceiling on Social Security payroll taxes altogether, forcing everyone to pay the 12.4% tax — split evenly between employee and employer — on all their wages.
There's another proposal that suggests carving out a "donut hole," if you will, that would eliminate Social Security payroll taxes for those over the $168,600 ceiling (which is itself adjusted for inflation annually) and then implement it again for those with annual wages over $400,000.
For example, if this system were in place today, someone earning $200,000 per year would only pay taxes on the first $168,600 they earned. The remaining $31,400 wouldn't be subject to the Social Security payroll tax. If someone earned $450,000, they would pay Social Security payroll taxes on their first $168,600 and on the $50,000 over the $400,000 mark.
A recent University of Maryland study looked at the opinions of adults in six key swing states in the 2024 election, and found that a majority of them were strongly in favor of this option. Overall, 87% supported this idea, and the percentages in favor were pretty close among Republicans, Democrats and Independents. But that doesn't mean it's going to happen.
How this would affect Social Security
This reform would have a significant effect on Social Security's future, but it wouldn't be enough to ensure its future solvency. The survey revealed that if it were enacted, it would reduce the funding shortfall by about 60%. So at best, this would just kick the problem down the road a little way.
To ensure Social Security's stability for decades to come, the government would have to do more. There's likely no one solution that would fix the problem. It's probably going to come down to a combination of strategies that either increase the program's funding or reduce the benefits payable to retirees, disabled workers, surviving spouses and their families.
Therein lies the reason no one has come up with a magic fix for Social Security yet. The "donut hole" approach to Social Security payroll taxes appeals to a lot of people because it's not going to cause the average worker any financial hardship. But that's not the case for a lot of the other proposals on the table.
Increasing the Social Security payroll tax rate would leave workers with less money to spend today. Raising the full retirement age (FRA), as some have suggested, would essentially act as a benefit cut, because workers would face steeper early claiming penalties than applicants do now. Reducing benefits would also compromise the financial security of many retirees.
So there aren't easy answers. But the government has to decide on something within the next few years. When it does, we will all have to take a hard look at our retirement plans and adjust accordingly. The best thing workers can do right now is to save what they can on their own, so they're less dependent on Social Security in retirement.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (341)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Japan ad giant and other firms indicted over alleged Olympic contract bid-rigging
- Transcript: National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on Face the Nation, July 16, 2023
- No ideological splits, only worried justices as High Court hears Google case
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- North Dakota, Using Taxpayer Funds, Bailed Out Oil and Gas Companies by Plugging Abandoned Wells
- Beyoncé's Adidas x Ivy Park Drops a Disco-Inspired Swim Collection To Kick off the Summer
- Get a Rise Out of Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds' Visit to the Great British Bake Off Set
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Air quality alerts issued for Canadian wildfire smoke in Great Lakes, Midwest, High Plains
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- OceanGate Believes All 5 People On Board Missing Titanic Sub Have Sadly Died
- Inside Clean Energy: The Era of Fossil Fuel Power Plants Is Rapidly Receding. Here Is Their Life Expectancy
- 3 congressmen working high-stakes jobs at a high-stakes moment — while being treated for cancer
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- An Explosion in Texas Shows the Hidden Dangers of Tanks Holding Heavy Fuels
- ‘There Are No Winners Here’: Drought in the Klamath Basin Inflames a Decades-Old War Over Water and Fish
- Inside Clean Energy: The Era of Fossil Fuel Power Plants Is Rapidly Receding. Here Is Their Life Expectancy
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
As G-20 ministers gather in Delhi, Ukraine may dominate — despite India's own agenda
How the cats of Dixfield, Maine came into a fortune — and almost lost it
Trains, Walking, Biking: Why Germany Needs to Look Beyond Cars
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Theme Park Packing Guide: 24 Essential Items You’ll Want to Bring to the Parks This Summer
The Voice Announces 2 New Coaches for Season 25 in Surprise Twist
Suspect wanted for 4 murders in Georgia killed in standoff with police