Current:Home > MyProsecutors in Arizona’s fake electors case dispute defendants’ allegations of a political motive -FundPrime
Prosecutors in Arizona’s fake electors case dispute defendants’ allegations of a political motive
View
Date:2025-04-15 00:45:25
PHOENIX (AP) — A three-day hearing on whether to dismiss charges against Republicans accused of plotting to overturn the results of the close 2020 presidential race in Arizona concluded Wednesday with prosecutors insisting their case is not politically motivated after defendants argued their alleged conduct was constitutionally protected free speech.
What’s the case about?
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Bruce Cohen is considering requests from at least a dozen of 18 people indicted in April to dismiss charges of fraud, conspiracy and forgery. Those charged in the case include 11 people who submitted a document falsely claiming Donald Trump defeated Joe Biden in Arizona, two former Trump aides and five lawyers connected to Trump, including Rudy Giuliani.
Trump was not charged but was referred to as an unindicted co-conspirator in the indictment.
The indictment alleges that Giuliani pressured Maricopa County officials and state legislators to change the election results and encouraged Republican electors in the state to vote for Trump in mid-December 2020. The indictment says Giuliani spread false claims of election fraud in Arizona and presided over a downtown Phoenix gathering where he claimed officials made no effort to determine the accuracy of presidential election results.
Prosecutors insist the case is not politically motivated
Prosecutor Nicholas Klingerman told the judge Wednesday that it was an Arizona grand jury that issued the indictments and that the prosecution is not driven by animus for Republicans.
“This prosecution involves nothing more than enforcing the law against those who are alleged to have committed frauds, forgeries and conspiracies to change the outcome of a lawful election because they were unsatisfied with the results,” Klingerman said. “And like all criminal prosecutions, it seeks to punish prior behavior, educate the public, and deter future efforts to do the same thing.”
“The fact is that the state asked the grand jury to consider not indicting more Republicans than the grand jury actually indicted,” Klingerman added. “The state asked the grand jury to consider not indicting Donald Trump.”
In a statement issued after the hearing, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes described the defendants’ motions as an effort to “deflect from the facts of this case and muddy the waters in the public eye.”
“Let me be clear: the indictments in this case were not politically motivated,” Mayes said.
Defense attorneys base their case on a free speech argument
Defense attorneys argued that Mayes has used the indictment to silence their clients’ constitutionally protected speech about the 2020 election and actions taken in response to its outcome.
On Wednesday, they cited an Arizona law that bars using baseless legal actions in a bid to silence critics. They also said Mayes campaigned on investigating fake electors and showed a bias against Trump and his supporters.
What is the law being cited by defense attorneys?
The law in question, commonly referred to as an anti-SLAPP statute, had long offered protections from civil lawsuits before it was amended in 2022 by the Republican-led Legislature to cover people facing most criminal charges.
It states that in a legal action involving lawful exercise of certain rights, such as speech, individuals can file a motion to dismiss and they must show that the legal action is “substantially motivated” by a “desire to deter, retaliate against or prevent the lawful exercise of a constitutional right.”
The anti-SLAPP law has not been used in a criminal case since it was modified in 2022, according to a spokesperson for Mayes.
Prosecutors contend that the Arizona law does not apply to this case. But the judge pressed Klingerman Wednesday about what he considered to be illegal acts allegedly committed by the defendants.
“I’m really concerned about the difference between speech and acts,” Cohen said.
When will the judge decide on the motions to dismiss?
Cohen said Tuesday he would rule separately on each motion — potentially at different times — but did not indicate Wednesday when he would issue the rulings.
Former Trump campaign attorney Jenna Ellis, who worked closely with Giuliani, signed a cooperation agreement with prosecutors that led to the dismissal of her charges. Republican activist Loraine Pellegrino became the first person to be convicted in the Arizona case when she pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and was sentenced to probation.
The remaining defendants have pleaded not guilty. Their trial is scheduled to start Jan. 5, 2026.
Former Trump presidential chief of staff Mark Meadows is trying to move his charges to federal court, where his lawyers say they will seek a dismissal.
___
Associated Press writer Gabriel Sandoval in Phoenix contributed to this report.
veryGood! (828)
Related
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Doncic leads strong close by Mavericks for 108-105 win over Wolves in Game 1 of West finals
- 'The Kardashians' Season 5: Where to watch, episode schedule, date, time, streaming info
- At the ‘Super Bowl of Swine,’ global barbecuing traditions are the wood-smoked flavor of the day
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Bayer Leverkusen unbeaten season at risk trailing Atalanta 2-0 at halftime in Europa League final
- New college grads face a cooling job market. Here's where the jobs are.
- Federal Reserve minutes: Policymakers saw a longer path to rate cuts
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- CDC: Second human infected with bird flu linked to U.S. dairy cows
Ranking
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Stars vs. Oilers: How to watch, live stream and more to know about Game 1
- Murders solved by senior citizens? How 'cozy mystery' books combine crime with comfort
- Person fatally shot by Washington state trooper during altercation on I-5 identified as Idaho man
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Judge agrees to delay Hunter Biden trial in California tax fraud case as Delaware trial looms
- New York Senate passes bill to tighten legal standard Harvey Weinstein used to toss rape conviction
- How Vanessa Hudgens Leaned on Her High School Musical Experience on The Masked Singer
Recommendation
Sam Taylor
Federal Reserve minutes: Policymakers saw a longer path to rate cuts
Bell recovered from iconic World War I shipwreck returned to U.S. over a century after it sank
If any body is a beach body, any book is a beach read. Try on these books this summer.
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
The Daily Money: Trump Media posts a loss
Paris Games could include the sight of helmet-wearing surfers on huge waves in Tahiti
How Vanessa Hudgens Leaned on Her High School Musical Experience on The Masked Singer