Current:Home > NewsNew federal rule would bar companies from forcing ‘noncompete’ agreements on employees -FundPrime
New federal rule would bar companies from forcing ‘noncompete’ agreements on employees
View
Date:2025-04-12 14:54:33
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. companies would no longer be able to bar employees from taking jobs with competitors under a rule approved by a federal agency Tuesday, though the rule is sure to be challenged in court.
The Federal Trade Commission voted Tuesday to ban measures known as noncompete agreements, which bar workers from jumping to or starting competing companies for a prescribed period of time. According to the FTC, 30 million people — roughly one in five workers — are now subject to such restrictions.
The Biden administration has taken aim at noncompete measures, which are commonly associated with high-level executives at technology and financial companies but in recent years have also ensnared lower-paid workers, such as security guards and sandwich-shop employees. A 2021 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis found that more than one in 10 workers who earn $20 or less an hour are covered by noncompete agreements.
When it proposed the ban in January 2023, FTC officials asserted that noncompete agreements harm workers by reducing their ability to switch jobs for higher pay, a step that typically provides most workers with their biggest pay increases. By reducing overall churn in the job market, the agency argued, the measures also disadvantage workers who aren’t covered by them because fewer jobs become available as fewer people leave jobs. They can also hurt the economy overall by limiting the ability of other businesses to hire needed employees, the FTC said.
Business groups have criticized the measure as casting too wide a net by blocking nearly all noncompetes. They also argue that the FTC lacks the authority to take such a step. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has said it will sue to block the measure, a process that could prevent the rule from taking effect for months or years. And if former President Donald Trump wins the 2024 presidential election, his administration could withdraw the rule.
veryGood! (78713)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- On Chernobyl anniversary, Zelenskyy slams Russia for using nuclear power plants to blackmail Ukraine and the world
- Boy Meets World's Ben Savage Marries Longtime Love Tessa Angermeier
- Authorities in China question staff at U.S. consulting firm Bain & Company in Shanghai
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Transcript: Rep. Ro Khanna on Face the Nation, April 30, 2023
- Penn Badgley Suggests You Season 5 Could Be Its Grand Finale
- Here's how Americans view facial recognition and driverless cars
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Researchers explore an unlikely treatment for cognitive disorders: video games
Ranking
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- That smiling LinkedIn profile face might be a computer-generated fake
- The Indicator: Destroying Personal Digital Data
- BeReal is Gen Z's new favorite social media app. Here's how it works
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Nancy Meyers' $130 Million Netflix Movie Shut Down Over Budget Issues
- Will Elon Musk turn activist at Twitter?
- The Fate of Days of Our Lives Revealed
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
Apple workers in Atlanta become company's 1st retail workers to file to unionize
Scotland's Stone of Destiny'' has an ancient role in King Charles' coronation. Learn its centuries-old story.
Russia is restricting social media. Here's what we know
McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
Zachary Levi Shares Message to His Younger Self Amid Mental Health Journey
COMIC: How a computer scientist fights bias in algorithms
Sleep Your Way to Perfect Skin With Skincare Products That Work Overnight