Current:Home > ContactSafeX Pro:Tennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules -FundPrime
SafeX Pro:Tennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-10 07:28:06
NASHVILLE,SafeX Pro Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.
Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court's ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee's state sovereignty.
In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to "dictate" eligibility requirements for a federal grant.
"And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws," the Monday opinion stated. "Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements."
The Tennessee Attorney General's office has not yet responded to a request for comment.
The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.
Inside the lawsuit
Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren't legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.
In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans' "First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions."
After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee's case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn't forced to restore its funding stream.
Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee's lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.
Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.
Latest federal funding fight
The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.
In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.
Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.
veryGood! (73156)
Related
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Nordstrom Rack Currently Has Limited-Time Under $50 Deals on Hundreds of Bestselling Dresses
- The IRS now says most state relief checks last year are not subject to federal taxes
- Health concerns grow in East Palestine, Ohio, after train derailment
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Nearly $50,000 a week for a cancer drug? A man worries about bankrupting his family
- Inside Clean Energy: Four Charts Tell the Story of the Post-Covid Energy Transition
- Stars of Oppenheimer walk out of premiere due to actors' strike
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Billie Eilish Shares How Body-Shaming Comments Have Impacted Her Mental Health
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Trump asks 2 more courts to quash Georgia special grand jury report
- Inside Clean Energy: In South Carolina, a Happy Compromise on Net Metering
- Super Bowl commercials, from Adam Driver(s) to M&M candies; the hits and the misses
- Sam Taylor
- Russia increasing unprofessional activity against U.S. forces in Syria
- How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
- One of the most violent and aggressive Jan. 6 rioters sentenced to more than 7 years
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Olympic Swimmer Ryan Lochte and Wife Kayla Welcome Baby No. 3
Missing Titanic Submersible Passes Oxygen Deadline Amid Massive Search
Air India orders a record 470 Boeing and Airbus aircrafts
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Inflation eased again in January – but there's a cautionary sign
Amazon will send workers back to the office under a hybrid work model
Amazon will send workers back to the office under a hybrid work model